Transclusion enabled Rich Text Editors

Comments

[this is good]
great post! isn't the issue here security, though? Nelson didn't envision (from my readings) a world where behaviors were attached to the content in hypertext documents, and even if he did, they certainly weren't on the scale we use them today, where we can file our taxes or apply for marriage licenses or pay our bills using hypertext documents.

As a result, I think there's a leap to be made in terms of enabling the sort of user experience you've described while not making ourselves vulnerable to cross-site scripting issues or even the inevitable phishing and fraud that can go on through giving a source site the ability to change content on my page.

We're facing this issue all over the web with widgets, which offer much of a Nelsonesque vision of transclusion, albeit in predefined and somewhat constrained ways. How would this be different.

And finally, have you tried out the VoxThis feature of Vox? It starts more from the source content side of things, but I think the experience on sites like YouTube is actually pretty far along.
Thanks Anil.

Yes, security is the issue. The server component has to be robust enough to not allow script injection or html that's going to break a page. I'd also want some logical control in place iwhen the page is presented so that if the original source is changed - it does not get presented without a second publishing or approval from me.
I like the VoxThis feature but it works best when you're citing a single source. Since I tend to ramble between multiple topics that's a little limiting.

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in

villiageidiot

About Me

villiageidiot
United States
I'm a lot more clever in person

My Groups

Neighborhood

Explore friends, family, friends & family, or entire neighborhood.

Archives